Blog

A
A
Home | Blog | How Terrible Are Some Scientific Journals?

How Terrible Are Some Scientific Journals?

April 24, 2014
Recently, a reporter for the Ottawa Citizen wrote a completely fabricated and incoherent paper on soils, cancer treatment, and Mars. Its full title? "Acidity and aridity: Soil inorganic carbon storage exhibits complex relationship with low-pH soils and myeloablation followed by autologous PBSC infusion." The paper, comprised solely of unrelated phrases lifted from existing research, was then submitted to 18 low-level, for-profit journals that cater to the segment of the academic market comprised of individuals willing to pay for publication and, by extension, their own tenure and promotion. The result? Eight quickly responded with offers to publish the work for payments between $1000 and $5000.

Follow Mises Institute

Add Comment